mini hifu

Is it good to do ultrasonic knife beauty? Does it really have side effects?

Everyone has the heart to love beauty. If you see that it can delay skin aging only once, many women who love beauty will be excited by such publicity. Ultrasonic knife has always been known as an artifact of rejuvenation. Many stars in the entertainment industry are its ultimate fans. So what is ultrasonic knife beauty? Is it really that good? Generally, it can last for several years. Let’s explore it together!

Ultrasonic knife” is a kind of ultrasonic with good penetration ability, which is divided into medical equipment and beauty equipment. The ultrasonic knife for cosmetic use focuses on the skin 1.6-4.5mm (fascia layer) with high intensity. It generates high-frequency friction between each other during focusing by transmitting 600-1200 ultrasonic nanowaves at the same time, arousing thousands of thermal coagulation nodes, and instantly generating a high temperature of 60 ~ 75 degrees. The thermal stimulation produced by ultrasonic scalpel will lead to three stages of fascia cells: 1. Cell thermal injury; 2. Gather their own energy to repair; 3. Generate new cells.

After these three stages of cell repair, a large number of (survival too) too cells are generated in the body, so that the tightened skin is firmly repositioned on the fascia collagen scaffold, and the too cells are gradually combined into orderly collagen, so as to really stimulate the regeneration of cells and the repair of fascia, so as to achieve the purpose of lifting, tightening and smooth skin.

Clinical verification of ultrasonic scalpel cosmetology in the American Medical History: through the ultrasonic scalpel cosmetology instrument for skin stimulation, combined with the oral (survival too) generation of too, a two-way combination of anti-aging physiotherapy process, clinical verification showed that 1148 patients had different degrees of improvement in wrinkles, sagging, coarse pores and skin luster after ultrasonic scalpel. Among them, 987 cases (85.97%) were effective, 161 cases (14.03%) were effective, and there were no ineffective cases.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *